BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//AERI - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://aeri.website
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for AERI
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20200101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20200101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20210714T040000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20210714T053000
DTSTAMP:20260424T163433
CREATED:20210605T150609Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210629T144932Z
UID:2767-1626235200-1626240600@aeri.website
SUMMARY:Keynote: Professor Sue McKemmish
DESCRIPTION:KEYNOTE: Prof. Sue McKemmish\nModerator: Dr Joanne Evans \nRegister for this session here: https://forms.gle/1Sxii9kcPKQZQ7w3A \nBio: I have been immersed in recordkeeping and archives for over four decades\, first as an archivist working for the National Archives of Australia and the Public Record Office of Victoria. Joining Monash in 1990\, my research focused on Records Continuum theory and conceptual modelling\, recordkeeping metadata\, and smart information consumer portals. My theory-building and modelling work on the Records Continuum has continued throughout my career. In more recent times\, as my Continuum thinking and modelling have continued to evolve\, I have focused on community-centred\, participatory recordkeeping and archiving\, and rights in records in the context of social justice and human rights agendas\, complemented by ethics of care\, particularly in response to advocacy by those with lived experience of Out-of-Home Care\, and First Nations peoples in Australia. Developing inclusive\, reflexive research design and practice in partnership with communities has been a guiding principle. \n \nDigital Equity through Data Sovereignty\nEmerita Professor Sue McKemmish \nwith Associate Professor Joanne Evans\, Dr Shannon Faulkhead\, Dr Frank Golding\, Associate \nProfessor Gillian Oliver\, Dr Greg Rolan\, Kirsten Thorpe \nImagine global digital equity — real equity\, beyond mere access to technology. We envision a world where information is used to sustain and nourish communities\, families\, and individuals; a world where discourses around data\, and ethics and privacy have shifted away from an exclusive focus on commercial considerations towards technologies for humanist self-actualisation; and\, importantly\, a world where marginalised and displaced peoples can establish and maintain rights in their information\, as a crucial\, but currently unmet\, foundation for exercising their human rights. \n-(Digital equity through data sovereignty: a vision for sustaining humanity – paper presented at Sustainable Digital Communities\, iConference 2020\, Borås\, Sweden) \nDigital equity is a global issue\, a societal grand challenge in both developed and developing contexts. By definition such a wicked problem needs transdisciplinary and international engagement – across the data and information sciences\, IT\, cybersecurity\, information cultures\, information literacy\, and a host of domain-specific disciplines such as First Nations studies\, ethics\, law\, the arts … \nKey research areas include transnational information ecologies and cultures\, data sovereignty\, rights-based approaches to meeting information\, identity\, memory\, cultural heritage\, evidence and accountability needs\, community empowerment\, the co-design of people-centred systems and technologies\, and equitable\, ethical and accountable governance frameworks. \nFollowing an overview of digital equity as a societal grand challenge with particular reference to the recordkeeping and archival field\, the Keynote paper focuses on Data Sovereignty and the potential contribution of transformative recordkeeping and archiving research and practice. \nFirst Nations peoples around the world are claiming Data Sovereignty and defining data extensively in ways that are inclusive of records and archives. They point to how data has been weaponized against them in colonial-settler societies\, and plays a critical role in the ongoing colonial project. Records held in government and non-Indigenous organisations and institutional archives are repositories of data (broadly defined as inclusive of information and records) created about and collected from First Nations people from the time of invasion. Indigenous Data Sovereignty is central to First Nations Sovereignty and self-determination. Conventional\, western colonial data and recordkeeping practices dispossessed Indigenous people of their cultural material and knowledge\, and were instruments of colonialism\, with records and archives being weaponised against indigenous peoples since colonisation and continuing to be used against them in the digital environment. \nIn Australia\, the Indigenous Data Sovereignty Communique Maiam nayri Wingara 2018 – https://www.maiamnayriwingara.org – addresses all individuals and entities involved in the creation\, collection\, access\, analysis\, interpretation\, management\, dissemination and reuse of data and data infrastructure in Australia. The Communique defines Indigenous data\, data sovereignty and data governance broadly as follows: \n\n‘Indigenous Data’ refers to data\, records\, information or knowledge\, in any format\nor medium\, which is about and may affect Indigenous peoples both collectively and\nindividually;\n‘Indigenous Data Sovereignty’ is the right of Indigenous peoples to exercise\nownership over Indigenous Data; and\n‘Indigenous Data Governance’ refers to the right of Indigenous peoples to\nautonomously decide what\, how and why Indigenous Data are collected\, accessed\nand used.\n\nHow will/should the recordkeeping and archiving field respond? UNICEF has recently issued a Manifesto entitled The Case for Better Governance of Children’s Data. It draws attention to the way data\, broadly defined\, has been weaponized against the best interest of the child – through surveillance cultures\, predictive analyses that amplify bias and discrimination\, data profiling and the use of data to manipulate behavior\, and failure to address issues of consent\, child protection and representation. With reference to children in refugee settings\, it points to the amplified impact on vulnerable children. The Manifesto identifies 10 actions that could progress child-centred\, child rights-based data governance\, including greater agency for children and their communities in policy making and data management. \nThe Keynote will explore the role of data sovereignty in the digital world\, and in enabling the actualisation of human rights. While an inability to exercise agency in data affects many\, it disproportionately impacts marginalised and displaced peoples. The paper will discuss participatory Australian research projects undertaken in partnership with communities\, which aim to contribute to a future where data\, broadly defined\, is neither weaponised nor exploited\, but considered as sovereign to individuals\, families and communities\, for example Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities\, and members of the Out of Home Care community with lived experience of the Care system\, including Indigenous children and young people\, and Stolen Generations.
URL:https://aeri.website/event/keynote-professor-sue-mckemmish/
CATEGORIES:Virtual AERI 2021
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20210714T130000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20210714T140000
DTSTAMP:20260424T163433
CREATED:20210605T151353Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210624T153346Z
UID:2769-1626267600-1626271200@aeri.website
SUMMARY:Short Papers: Archival History
DESCRIPTION:SHORT PAPERS: THEME – ARCHIVAL HISTORY\nChair: Jane Zhang \nRegister in advance for this meeting: \nhttps://cua.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZMlfumsrjorGddLOrCuyb43Nww4TBF5BqKY \nAfter registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting. \n  \nPapers:\nExploring the value and meaning of professional work: a recent history of religious archivists in Ireland  \nSpeakers:\nDr Elizabeth Mullins\, University College Dublin \nAbstract:\nThis paper describes current work which focuses on the recent history of archivists in religious organizations in Ireland. The repositories of many of these organizations have been the focus of much public attention in the context of processing the history of institutional care in Ireland in the 20th century. Religious archives have also been the subject of scholarly comment that has highlighted the immense value of their records to the broader history of Ireland. In the midst of this kind of commentary\, the voice of the archivist has been relatively quiet. Recent research that has been carried out by archivists has focused on describing the content of holdings\, the history of institutions and the pastoral function of archives but has not generally connected to archival theoretical literature. This project begins to address this neglect. The research seeks through means of a literature review and resulting survey to describe the experience of being an archivist in a religious organization in contemporary Ireland\, focusing on areas such as appraisal\, access\, organizational context\, and emotional labor. The research will also explore if it is possible to link the idea of writing a history of the profession with a discussion of the values and meaning which sustain archivists\, particularly when working in contested spaces.  In this sense while focusing on a specific group of professionals the research seeks to contribute to contemporary discussion around the role of affect and the extent to which meaning matters in archival work. This paper will introduce the contemporary context\, research design and status of this on-going project. \nThe Historical Context and Stage Characteristics of Archives Administrative Supervision in China \nSpeakers:\n\nYao Jing\, School of Information Resource Management\, Renmin University of China\nJia Xiaoshuang\, School of Information Resource Management\, Renmin University of China\nXu Yongjun\, School of Information Resource Management\, Renmin University of China\n\nAbstract:\n“Archives administrative supervision” is a system of supervision and inspection of archives work with Chinese characteristics. It emphasizes that the department in charge of archives should supervise and inspect archives work in the administrative areas based on the administrative authority according to law. The purpose is to strengthen archives management and standardize archives work; The subject is the Archives Bureau at all levels; The objects cover the archives work from central to local; The content includes the implementation of policies and the punishment of illegal archives activities; The methods include on-site archives supervision and inspection\, etc. Based on the perspective of historicism\, this paper uses policy analysis method to analyze the relevant archives laws and regulations. Taking the promulgation time of the Archives Law in 1987\, 1996\, 2016 and 2020 as the dividing node\, the development history of Chinese archives administrative supervision is divided into four stages: brewing stage (1949-1987)\, germination stage (1987-1996)\, development stage (1996-2020) and strengthening stage (since 2020). In the brewing stage\, there was lack of legal basis\, weak supervision consciousness and unclear supervision subject; In the germination stage\, the overall supervision framework had taken shape from no law to having law\, from scattered regulations to special regulations; In the development stage\, the legal work had achieved fruitful results\, and the subject\, object and content had been further clarified; In the strengthening stage\, the new revision of the Archives Law in 2020 has achieved a “qualitative leap” and put forward new requirements for the reform. By combing the historical context and summarizing the characteristics of four stages\, this paper summarizes the following its five historical evolution characteristics: First\, supervision laws are increasingly perfect. Second\, supervision subjects emphasize coordination. Third\, supervision objects change with the times. Fourth\, supervision content is constantly enriched. Fifth\, supervision means are gradually diversified. \nWill this session be recorded for the AERI2021 Youtube channel? Yes
URL:https://aeri.website/event/short-papers-archival-history/
CATEGORIES:Virtual AERI 2021
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20210714T140000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20210714T150000
DTSTAMP:20260424T163433
CREATED:20210605T151553Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210624T153422Z
UID:2771-1626271200-1626274800@aeri.website
SUMMARY:Workshop: Teaching About/In Community Archives: Workshopping Strategies for Teaching Equivocal Archival Practices
DESCRIPTION:WORKSHOP: Teaching About/In Community Archives: Workshopping Strategies for Teaching Equivocal Archival Practices\nRegister in advance for this meeting: \nhttps://pitt.zoom.us/meeting/register/tJ0uc-qvpjwtGd0zNdWUhKUy0JUAbdIe7Wm9 \nSpeakers:\n\nJane Thaler\, University of Pittsburgh\nChelsea Gunn\, University of Pittsburgh\n\nAccessibility details:\nSlides\, prompts\, any complimentary materials\, and the collaborative document will be made publicly available both in advance of and after the workshop. Alt text will be provided for any visual components. Live transcription will be enabled. \nAbstract:\nAs instructors in MLIS programs\, we have found that many students begin their studies with a desire for firm guidelines and best practices. At the same time\, we have observed steadily growing student interest in community and personal archives\, areas which sometimes ask us to productively break the rules of “traditional” archival practice. This liminality can be uncomfortable for students as they attempt to reconcile the perceived tensions between community/personal and professional archival practices. These tensions also reveal themselves when we teach archival practice in community settings. Professional archivists and community archives increasingly work in dialogue with one another. Our reflections on the shifting modalities between archival instruction within and beyond the MLIS classroom have prompted us to critically reexamine how we understand and teach archival theory and practice in both environments. This workshop invites participants to share and reflect on their experiences both teaching personal/community archives to MLIS students and working with/teaching community. How do these pedagogical practices inform each other? What strategies do we use to address these divergences? How does our work with community archives inform that work? Participants of this workshop will collaboratively produce a shared document of practices\, resources\, challenges\, and goals that have informed their approach to teaching community/personal archives. The collaborative document will remain accessible as a shared\, ongoing resource after the workshop has ended. \nWill this session be recorded for the AERI2021 YouTube channel? No
URL:https://aeri.website/event/workshop-teaching-about-in-community-archives-workshopping-strategies-for-teaching-equivocal-archival-practices/
CATEGORIES:Virtual AERI 2021
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20210714T150000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20210714T170000
DTSTAMP:20260424T163433
CREATED:20210605T151720Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210624T153459Z
UID:2773-1626274800-1626282000@aeri.website
SUMMARY:Workshop: Advancing an Agenda for Online Archival Pedagogy
DESCRIPTION:WORKSHOP: Advancing an Agenda for Online Archival Pedagogy\nPlease register via the link below: \nhttps://zoom.us/meeting/register/tJAudu6gqDMqEtRtdvQ7TiWUCWWgwe0TaaFU \nAfter registering you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the session. \nSpeakers:\n\nHeather Soyka\, Assistant Professor\, School of Information (iSchool)\, Kent State University\nKaren F. Gracy\, Professor\, School of Information (iSchool)\, Kent State University\nEdward Benoit\, Associate Professor and Associate Director of the School of Library & Information Science\, Louisiana State University\nSarah A. Buchanan\, Assistant Professor\, School of Information Science & Learning Technologies (iSchool)\, University of Missouri\nDonald C. Force\, Associate Professor\, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee School of Information Studies\n\nAccessibility details:\nWe plan to use live AI (automatic) captioning via Zoom and Otter.ai. \nAbstract:\nSituated within the shifting landscape of graduate education\, the development and delivery of online education has continued to change\, grow\, and perhaps started to stabilize. Graduate programs that provide online archival education in various forms (including asynchronous\, hybrid\, synchronous\, and more) share the common goal of educating and shaping new archival professionals and archival scholarship with location-based offline programs. Yet graduate educators teaching online have unique needs and challenges that merit the development of pedagogical plans and inclusive conversations about meeting the needs of archival students that are not geographically and synchronously congregated in a physical classroom. Further\, online programs often require consideration of different methods and models for scaffolding\, setting up necessary conversations\, and building networks that will serve students as they move into the profession. \nThis proposal for a workshop on online archival pedagogy\, to be held during AERI 2021\, sets out two goals: 1) to convene archival educators interested in advancing scholarship related to online archival pedagogy and its challenges/opportunity; 2) to identify and set out an agenda for archival education that identifies areas of need and is inclusive\, responsive\, and reflective of the gaps in discussing how to address the needs of the online classroom for the future of the archival profession. \nWorkshop schedule/agenda: \n\nIntroductions and sharing of online teaching experiences/interests (15 minutes)\nDiscussion of audiences for online education (similarities and differences to in-person audiences; particular needs of online students; assessment of online student learning and engagement) (15 minutes)\nIdentification and exploration of opportunities and challenges specific to archival studies online programs (30 minutes)\nInitial sketch of research agenda for online archival pedagogy (30 minutes)\n\nWill this session be recorded for the AERI 2021 YouTube channel? Yes\, we are willing to record/ share this on the closed AERI channel\, with notification to participants at the start that it will be recorded and shared.
URL:https://aeri.website/event/workshop-advancing-an-agenda-for-online-archival-pedagogy/
CATEGORIES:Virtual AERI 2021
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20210714T170000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20210714T190000
DTSTAMP:20260424T163433
CREATED:20210605T151755Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210624T153537Z
UID:2775-1626282000-1626289200@aeri.website
SUMMARY:Workshop: Editorial Work
DESCRIPTION:WORKSHOP: Editorial Work\nRegister for this event: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/workshop-editorial-work-tickets-158782521797 \nSpeakers:\nJames Lowry\, Queens College\, City University of New York \nAccessibility details:\nZoom auto captioning. \nAbstract:\nThis workshop is aimed at practitioners\, PhD students\, postdoctoral fellows and assistant professors with some publication record. This workshop will look at conceptualizing editorial projects\, choosing formats (edited books\, special issues\, proceedings\, etc.)\, identifying contributors\, identifying appropriate publishers and navigating the academic publishing racket\, the publication process (including managing peer review\, copy editing\, proof reading\, and indexing)\, supporting promotion and soliciting reviews. Participants are encouraged to come prepared to discuss an idea for an editorial project: we will work in small groups to develop and plan these projects. The workshop will be limited to 20 participants.
URL:https://aeri.website/event/workshop-editorial-work/
CATEGORIES:Virtual AERI 2021
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20210714T190000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20210714T210000
DTSTAMP:20260424T163433
CREATED:20210605T151914Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210624T153611Z
UID:2777-1626289200-1626296400@aeri.website
SUMMARY:Panel: Caring for Collections: Accessioning and Effective Archival Stewardship
DESCRIPTION:PANEL: Caring for Collections: Accessioning and Effective Archival Stewardship\nRegister in advance for this meeting: \nhttps://yalelibrary.zoom.us/meeting/register/tJctdeGvqDMqGNKP-ykEz6_-E9FMNKOSocK6 \nSpeakers:\n\nRosemary K. J. Davis\, Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript Library\, Yale University\nMeaghan O’Riordan\, Stuart A. Rose Manuscript\, Archives & Rare Book Library\, Emory University\n\nAbstract:\nArchival accessioning is often defined as taking physical\, legal\, and intellectual custody of newly acquired collection material. But this simplistic definition does not reflect the human experiences of physical\, intellectual\, and emotional labor–which can include juggling logistics\, managing donor relations\, and providing quick access through arrangement and description–performed during accessioning. \nIn 2019\, Rosemary K. J. Davis\, Accessioning Archivist for the Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript Library at Yale University\, and Meaghan O’Riordan\, Accessioning Archivist for the Stuart A. Rose Manuscript\, Archives & Rare Book Library at Emory University\, embarked upon a research project to examine archival accessioning labor throughout the United States. This research focuses on a deep examination of current accessioning labor with an accompanying analysis about ways to make this work more visible and effective. \nTheir talk will provide an overview of their research to date\, which includes a labor survey and multiple site visits. In particular\, Davis and O’Riordan will delve into a collaborative element of their project: the recently launched Best Practices for Archival Accessioning Working Group. Currently\, every organization develops their own unique accessioning workflows because–while arrangement and description\, public services\, and instruction protocols are developed using existing recognized best practices–there are no established standards for establishing and managing a comprehensive accessioning program. This working group aims to develop a suite of adaptable\, holistic workflows that can be used to implement and strengthen accessioning practices throughout the field. \nDeveloping a better understanding of how repositories define and navigate accessioning is crucial illuminating the and bringing visibility to the labor involved to performing special collections stewardship rooted in transparency and mutual trust between all parties. Through this forum and their research\, Davis and O’Riordan hope to kickstart thoughtful conversations within the profession about how to empathetically and efficiently care for collections through well-defined accessioning best practices. \nWill this session be recorded for the AERI2021 Youtube channel? Yes
URL:https://aeri.website/event/panel-caring-for-collections-accessioning-and-effective-archival-stewardship/
CATEGORIES:Virtual AERI 2021
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20210714T210000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20210714T230000
DTSTAMP:20260424T163433
CREATED:20210605T152105Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210709T023710Z
UID:2779-1626296400-1626303600@aeri.website
SUMMARY:Panel: Trauma and Archives: Supporting and Educating Archivists
DESCRIPTION:PANEL: Trauma and Archives: Supporting and Educating Archivists\nPlease register via the link below: https://unimelb.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_GXWNagBVRritAZkEnVdoiQ \nSpeakers:\n\nNicola Laurent\, University of Melbourne\nKirsten Wright\, University of Melbourne\nJennifer Douglas\, University of British Columbia\nKirsten Thorpe\, University of Technology Sydney\nVerne Harris\, Nelson Mandela Foundation\nMichaela Hart\, Victorian Department of Health\nAnna Sexton\, University College London\nItza Carbajal\, The University of Washington Seattle\nEmily Larson and Noah Duranseaud\, Indian Residential School History and Dialogue Centre\, University of British Columbia\nIsaac Fellman\, GLBT Historical Society\, San Francisco\nDaisy Murray-Smith\, Practitioner\nGary Brannan\, Practitioner\nSome speakers still TBC.\n\nAccessibility details:\nThe pre-recorded part of the webinar will be captioned. The live Q&A will not be live captioned. \nAbstract: This webinar will capture the broad range of activities occurring across the archival profession to educate\, train and provide support for archivists responding to the affective\, and sometimes traumatic nature of archives\, and to ensure archives are safe and empowering places for them\, their colleagues\, and their users. It will bring together archival professionals and educators to discuss the types of education around issues of trauma-informed archival practice and archival action\, activism and education more broadly. Contributors will highlight the multiple avenues for people to undertake education relevant to their work– formal education\, continuing education and professional development and training\, and informal opportunities. They will consider how students and professionals can be supported when dealing with difficult or traumatic material\, content or situations. They will discuss how this support is being built into education programs and professional practice including through the trauma-informed archives community of practice\, and the impact this has on pedagogy. This webinar will feature short videos from archival professionals and educators working to create trauma-informed content to support collaboration across all facets of archival education and the profession. It will emphasise the benefits in providing training\, support and resources around trauma-informed archives. It will conclude with a live Q&A with Nicola Laurent and Kirsten Wright\, the organisers of this session. \nWill this session be recorded for the AERI2021 Youtube channel? Yes
URL:https://aeri.website/event/panel-trauma-and-archives-supporting-and-educating-archivists/
CATEGORIES:Virtual AERI 2021
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20210714T230000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20210715T010000
DTSTAMP:20260424T163433
CREATED:20210617T190958Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210624T152443Z
UID:2872-1626303600-1626310800@aeri.website
SUMMARY:Identifying and enacting generous scholarly practice–the 2021 edition
DESCRIPTION:Identifying and enacting generous scholarly practice–the 2021 edition\nRegister in advance for this meeting: \nhttps://ubc.zoom.us/meeting/register/u5Mpcu-grDsvG9fBfcXtO9wCldyNQKr8El4H \nAfter registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting. \nPanel facilitators:\n\nMarika Cifor\nJennifer Douglas\nJamie A. Lee\n\nSession format:\nThis session can be held virtually\, using Zoom and the functionality it allows to use breakout rooms. One of the panel facilitators will host the meeting\, which can be password protected. \nDescription:\nAt last year’s AERI\, Marika Cifor\, Jennifer Douglas\, Jamie A. Lee and Tonia Sutherland facilitated a conversation on generosity in archival research\, scholarship and praxis. This year\, Marika\, Jennifer and Jamie will again make space for a community conversation about generosity\, why we need it\, what it looks across pedagogical and professional archival contexts\,and how we—individually and collectively—enact it. Acknowledging the various and unequal pressures\, losses\, worries and fears members of the AERI community have experienced over this past year\, we aim mostly to hold space for discussion. We ask upfront: How has generosity been demonstrated–or not–in the AERI and broader archives community this year? What kinds of generous acts and behaviours are particularly needed right now and how do we enact them? What pressures constrain generosity and how do we resist them? Faced with these pressures\, how can we continue to identify\, embody and model generous scholarship and scholarly practices at every career level?While some of us use individual strategies\, including for example feminist citation strategies and ethics of care\, this panel seeks to engage the wider AERI community in discussion about how to evolve as a generous research community. In this panel\, we will continue our discussion from last year to explore together how we can follow through on our shared commitment to working within the academy’s ethically compromised spaces in ways that do not just imbricate ourselves into the hierarchies of power\,but work to subvert\, undermine\, open doors\,and make different ways of working and doing possible.
URL:https://aeri.website/event/identifying-and-enacting-generous-scholarly-practice-the-2021-edition/
CATEGORIES:Virtual AERI 2021
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR